Structural anonymity
The system never knows who answered. Nodes with fewer than five people are consolidated at the level above, so no answer can be attributed to an individual. The fear of answering — which distorts any survey — disappears.
§ 02
SaaS
The platform that turns perception into proof.
The EHO method lives inside a software platform. That is where your company builds the structure, applies the diagnostic, reads the results and documents every step — with the integrity that labour inspection and the courts demand. This is not a climate survey form. It is a psychosocial risk management system, from questionnaire to technical report.
From org chart to report, in one flow.
01
Build the structure
Setup
You draw the company tree — units, departments, sub-departments — and place people in it. That structure is what distributes the survey and organises the results.
02
Run the survey
Collection
The system generates single-use anonymous access. Each employee answers via link or QR code, without identifying themselves at any point. There are 61 questions establishing the frequency of facts — not opinion, not feeling.
03
Read the results
Reading
Once collection closes, the Intelligence Centre opens the reading in layers: the 12 dimensions, the IPP · IRP · EDO · IGP indices, the risk matrix, the macro-vectors and the organisational phenomena detected.
04
Act on the plan
Action
Every phenomenon detected becomes a prioritised action, with an owner, a deadline and an expected outcome. No loose actions: every intervention arises from a finding.
05
Monitor and evidence
Cycle
In the next cycle the system compares before and after, measuring how effective the actions were. That is the proof of continuous progress NR-1 requires — not a snapshot, but a living record.
Built to withstand challenge.
A psychosocial diagnostic only protects you if nobody can claim it was manipulated. That is why the platform was built on four integrity guarantees:
Frozen structure
The moment the survey is launched, the structure, the method version and the universe of invitees are frozen. Nothing can be altered during collection. The result is a faithful picture of what was answered.
Chain of custody
Every stage is recorded: date, time, versioned structure, number of participants. The trail is auditable from start to finish.
Integrity hash
Every document generated receives a cryptographic code proving it has not been tampered with. Not even the contracting company can change questions, answers or results.
Every conclusion has a traceable origin.
In EHO, no result appears out of nowhere. There is a chain linking each recommendation back to the question that produced it:
- Questionnaire
- Dimensions
- Indices
- Macro-vectors
- Phenomena
- Action plan
You can start from any action in the plan and trace it back to the specific questions that generated it. That traceability is what separates a technical diagnostic from an impression — and it is what holds the report up in front of an auditor or a court-appointed expert.
A report for each audience.
The same diagnostic produces different documents depending on who will read them — and the confidentiality level adjusts the content:
Internal management
For HR and leadership. The full view: every dimension, probable causes, detailed phenomena and the action plan. This is the working basis for correction.
Executive
For the board and directors. A consolidated view by unit and macro-vector, with trends and strategic priorities.
NR-1 technical
For auditors, court-appointed experts and labour inspection. The corporate consolidation: macro-vectors, indices, methodology and evidence of compliance. Aggregation preserves anonymity and delivers exactly what the standard asks for.
Not every report counts. The certified one does.
The strength of a diagnostic depends on how many people took part. A report based on few respondents does not represent the environment — and will not survive challenge.
That is why EHO only grants the EHO Certification — the representative-sample seal — to reports that reach the required minimum participation. That seal is what distinguishes a document with compliance value from a simple preliminary reading.
When the case reaches the courts.
For labour claims, Ministério Público do Trabalho (Brazil's labour prosecution service) inquiries or expert examinations ordered by a judge, the platform generates an Expert Evidence Pack — a set of hash-authenticated PDFs, delivered without having to give third parties access to the system. It brings together the questionnaire as applied, the aggregated and anonymous results, the methodological record, the application log and the integrity certificate.
And there is one feature that makes that confidence tangible: public authenticity verification. Anyone — an expert, a judge, the opposing party — can enter a report code and confirm, with no login, that it is authentic and unaltered. The proof verifies itself.
It covers what the reference instruments cover — and what they leave out.
The EHO dimensions speak to the established scientific models of psychosocial risk. But they go beyond them at one decisive point: whereas international instruments mostly measure individual perceptions of demand, control and support, EHO also measures the organisation of work — the patterns of management, hierarchy and culture that are the source of the risk.
That is exactly the layer the GRO Manual, citing the literature, recognises as the origin of psychosocial factors. And it is the layer the Brazilian standard requires you to assess. Imported validation is not domestic compliance — EHO was built for the latter.
A method that states what it still has to prove.
EHO has consolidated theoretical foundations and regulatory alignment mapped dimension by dimension. Its statistical validation is under way — and that is stated openly, with the tests and targets defined publicly, ahead of any result.
Every real application, anonymously and in aggregate, strengthens the scientific basis of the method. Whoever uses EHO takes part in building the largest Brazilian dataset on psychosocial risk at work.
Two models, a fair price for your size.
Monthly
One survey per month, per company, for up to 100% of employees. Once a cycle is used, the next unlocks in 30 days. Ideal for those who want the continuous monitoring NR-1 asks for.
By tokens
Each token corresponds to one respondent, and unused tokens roll over to later cycles. Ideal for those who prefer flexibility of pace.
In both models the price accounts for the number of employees and of CNPJs (registered legal entities) — which is why it is quoted to measure.
§ Access
Try it before you decide.
EHO offers a full 14-day trial — with access to every screen, the gauges, the risk matrix, the macro-vectors and the phenomena, for up to 10 respondents. It is our way of going beyond what the law asks: instead of waiting for a right of withdrawal after purchase, you get to know EHO in full before it — and decide already knowing what you are buying.
Prefer a guided walkthrough? We show the method applied to your own reality.